Download Born free and equal? : a philosophical inquiry into the by Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen PDF

By Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen

ISBN-10: 0199796165

ISBN-13: 9780199796168

This article addresses those 3 concerns: what's discrimination? What makes it wrong?; What can be performed approximately wrongful discrimination? It argues that there are varied strategies of discrimination; that discrimination isn't regularly morally incorrect and that once it's, it's so basically as a result of its damaging effects.


This e-book addresses those 3 matters: what's discrimination?; What makes it wrong?; What may be performed approximately wrongful discrimination? It argues: that there are diversified options of Read more...

Show description

Read or Download Born free and equal? : a philosophical inquiry into the nature of discrimination PDF

Best legal theory & systems books

Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations: The Unspoken Forces of Organization Violations

This e-book brings jointly the subjects of gender, sexuality, violence and organisations. The authors synthesize the literature and learn which has been performed in those fields and supply a coherent framework for realizing the inter-relationship among those techniques. the significance of violence and abuse, and especially men's violence to girls, young children and different males has been good proven, particularly via feminist and a few pro-feminist learn.

The Measure of Injury: Race, Gender, and Tort Law

Tort legislation is the physique of legislations governing negligence, intentional misconduct, and different wrongful acts for which civil activities should be introduced. the normal knowledge is that the foundations, ideas, and constructions of tort legislation are impartial and impartial, freed from issues of gender and race. within the degree of harm, Martha Chamallas and Jennifer Wriggins end up that tort legislations is whatever yet gender and race impartial.

Hobbes and the Law

Hobbes's political inspiration provokes a perennial fascination. It has develop into really famous in recent times, with the surge of scholarly curiosity evidenced via a few monographs in political conception and philosophy. even as, there was a flip in felony scholarship in the direction of political idea in a fashion that engages recognisably Hobbesian issues, for instance the connection among safeguard and liberty.

Additional info for Born free and equal? : a philosophical inquiry into the nature of discrimination

Example text

Of course, if someone treated everyone exactly as he ought to treat them, he would, let us suppose, treat people differently. But barring a cosmic coincidence, his differential treatment would not be suitably explained by the differential group-membership of different individuals, but rather by their individual desert-levels, in which case it would not qualify as discrimination. If it were, 60 Cf. ” p. 159. 36 Born Free and Equal? 61 This completes my account of when a group is socially salient, which—just to recap—it is, if perceived membership of it is important to the structure of social interactions across a wide range of social contexts.

Obviously more needs to be said about what determines the relevance of act-types. 44 Compare Cavanagh (2002), Against Equality of Opportunity, p. 164. 45 Compare Narveson (1993), Moral Matters, p. 251. 43 What Is Discrimination? 46 To say that something is “discriminatory” does not logically commit one to any particular moral evaluation of that thing. Of course, this is consistent with group discrimination always being immoral and with group discrimination always being prima facie morally wrong given the social world in which we live.

45 Moreover, (v) allows us to say that racially biased, differential treatment in our love lives constitutes discrimination, if, as seems likely, it involves humiliating messages of inferiority. Finally, (v) explains the case of the single discriminatory act against a Protestant applicant, since it is true not only that such acts, if sufficiently common, would be harmful to Protestants, but also that the act in our example is motivated by animosity, a belief that Protestants are inferior, or a belief that Catholics and Protestants should not intermingle.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.04 of 5 – based on 43 votes