By Nicos Stavropoulos
ISBN-10: 0198258992
ISBN-13: 9780198258995
This ebook addresses a important subject in modern jurisprudence, particularly, if it is attainable for felony interpretations to be target. the writer argues that objectivity is feasible in legislation, and grounds this danger firmly in metaphysics, philosophy of brain and language, and meta-ethics. He then systematically explores the philosophical prejudices that experience operated as assets of resistance to this threat. those prejudices, as soon as pointed out, aid to light up primary debates in jurisprudence.
Read or Download Objectivity in Law PDF
Similar legal theory & systems books
Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations: The Unspoken Forces of Organization Violations
This publication brings jointly the topics of gender, sexuality, violence and corporations. The authors synthesize the literature and learn which has been performed in those fields and supply a coherent framework for figuring out the inter-relationship among those techniques. the significance of violence and abuse, and especially men's violence to ladies, young ones and different males has been good validated, particularly via feminist and a few pro-feminist study.
The Measure of Injury: Race, Gender, and Tort Law
Tort legislations is the physique of legislations governing negligence, intentional misconduct, and different wrongful acts for which civil activities might be introduced. the normal knowledge is that the foundations, recommendations, and constructions of tort legislation are impartial and impartial, freed from issues of gender and race. within the degree of harm, Martha Chamallas and Jennifer Wriggins end up that tort legislations is whatever yet gender and race impartial.
Hobbes's political notion provokes a perennial fascination. It has turn into relatively famous in recent times, with the surge of scholarly curiosity evidenced by way of a few monographs in political conception and philosophy. even as, there was a flip in felony scholarship in the direction of political conception in a fashion that engages recognisably Hobbesian subject matters, for instance the connection among safeguard and liberty.
- Understanding Jurisprudence
- Legal ethics and human dignity
- Economic Justice and Natural Law
- Law as Communication (European Academy of Legal Theory Series)
- The Legal Regulation of Pregnancy and Parenting in the Labour Market
- Legal ethics and human dignity
Additional info for Objectivity in Law
Sample text
This is clear in the example given, which stresses the fact that, once in power, the politician will find that he can no longer sustain his commitment to the absolute wrongness of torture. He believes torture to be absolutely wrong, he has given public assurances that he will have no truck with it, and he has come to power in part because he has given those assurances to the electorate. Once elected, however, he must at least consider authorizing torture in order to secure the political outcomes he has promised and on the basis of which he has been elected.
However, even here it must be stressed that the 24 Integrity connection between integrity and moral goodness is not straightforward: on this account, we can see quite clearly why Himmler might feel that he would have sacrificed his integrity had he abandoned the project of exterminating the Jews. He would, by his own lights, have associated with evil. Indeed, his own language makes this clear. He says: I also want to talk to you quite frankly on a very grave matter. . I mean . . the extermination of the Jewish race.
Nonetheless, the examples serve to highlight the differences between political lying and common-or-garden crookedness. The politician may indeed do what is morally wrong, but, unlike the crook, he may do that for us. So the conclusion that politicians are morally worse than the rest of us needs to be moderated by the recognition that we (the citizens) need Political Integrity 53 people who are both able and willing to do what is morally disagreeable. Additionally, it is important to note that typically politicians act to further the interests of their own compatriots or constituents, and this is not the same as acting so as to promote the greater good tout court.