Download The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law by Jules Coleman, Scott J. Shapiro PDF

By Jules Coleman, Scott J. Shapiro

ISBN-10: 019927097X

ISBN-13: 9780199270972

One of many first volumes within the new sequence of prestigious Oxford Handbooks, The Oxford instruction manual of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law brings jointly specifically commissioned essays by way of twenty-seven of the key criminal theorists presently writing, to supply a country of the paintings evaluate of jurisprudential scholarship. every one writer provides an account of the contending perspectives and scholarly debates animating their box of enquiry in addition to surroundings the time table for additional learn. This landmark booklet can be crucial studying for an individual operating in felony idea and of curiosity to felony students in general, philosophers and criminal theorists searching for a fashion in to appreciate present jurisprudential pondering.

Show description

Read Online or Download The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law PDF

Best legal theory & systems books

Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations: The Unspoken Forces of Organization Violations

This ebook brings jointly the topics of gender, sexuality, violence and agencies. The authors synthesize the literature and examine which has been performed in those fields and supply a coherent framework for figuring out the inter-relationship among those options. the significance of violence and abuse, and especially men's violence to girls, childrens and different males has been good demonstrated, specially via feminist and a few pro-feminist study.

The Measure of Injury: Race, Gender, and Tort Law

Tort legislations is the physique of legislations governing negligence, intentional misconduct, and different wrongful acts for which civil activities could be introduced. the normal knowledge is that the foundations, innovations, and constructions of tort legislation are impartial and impartial, freed from issues of gender and race. within the degree of harm, Martha Chamallas and Jennifer Wriggins end up that tort legislation is something yet gender and race impartial.

Hobbes and the Law

Hobbes's political notion provokes a perennial fascination. It has develop into fairly in demand lately, with the surge of scholarly curiosity evidenced via a few monographs in political idea and philosophy. while, there was a flip in felony scholarship in the direction of political concept in a fashion that engages recognisably Hobbesian topics, for instance the connection among protection and liberty.

Additional resources for The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law

Example text

Classical natural law theory, in its contemporary forms, addresses these issues explicitly, and justifies the sharp distinction between criminal and civil law which is characteristic of modern legal systems but not of ancient or even medieval practice and theory. 90 The opportunity to use retributively justified punishments to deter and reform is only a bonus side-effect, and measures intended to deter and/or reform cannot rightly be more deleterious to the convicted offenders' interests than can be justified by retributive considerations.

Breach of duty is violation of right and ‘cause of action’. But equally, theories which put on the mantle of Aristotelian ‘corrective justice’ have failed to fill the gaps in Aristotle's account: its insufficient attention to the primary rights and duties which make wrongs identifiable as wrongs, and its neglect to explain just how breach of primary right warrants tort's normal judicial order of fully compensatory damages. 57) denouncing as anachronisms those features of the law unaccounted for—not shown to be justified, or shown to be unjustifiable—by their rival accounts.

That carrying out is typically—and in all cases that are within the proper scope of the criminal law—by bodily movements (though there are certainly acts, such as prayer or mental calculation, where there is no movement of the acting person). The criminal law thereby creates for itself—and for good reason—problems that do not arise in purely moral reflection, in which what is intended, generally (as end) and specifically (as means), is decisive for judgment more or less independently of what in fact happens or fails to happen as a result.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.75 of 5 – based on 25 votes